Baltic Dental and Maxillofacial Journal
Main page Back issues Editorial board Information

June, 2020, Vol. 22, No. 2

CONTENTS

ACTUAL REPORT

Coronavirus Disease-2019 and dental practice: A project on the use of ozonized water in the water circuit of the dental armchair
Bardellini Elena, Amadori Francesca, Veneri Federica, Conti Giulio, Majorana Alessandra
35-38

SCIENTIFIC ARTICLES

Head and face injuries in elderly patients victims of fall. A single trauma center analysis
Alidianne Fábia Cabral Cavalcanti, Sabrina da Silva Sousa Formiga, Taynná Dantas de Arruda, Rogéria Máximo de Lavôr, Christiane Leite Cavalcanti, Catarina Ribeiro Barros de Alencar, Sergio d’Avila, Alessandro Leite Cavalcanti
39-43

REVIEWS

Stress and associated factors among dentists
Guostė Antanavičienė, Monika Zaleckytė, Julija Narbutaitė
44-48

Enamel matrix derivate induces periodontal regeneration by activating growth factors: A review
Rūta Kulakauskienė, Rokas Aukštakalnis, Renata Šadzevičienė
49-53

SCIENTIFIC ARTICLES

Heritability of mandibular asymmetries in sagittal direction: A cephalometric study
Ingrida Rakauskaite, Vilma Svalkauskiene, Zygimantas Labanauskas, Donata Juozėnaitė, Giedrė Trakinienė, Justina Vaiciuniene

54-57

REVIEWS

Use of platelet-rich fibrin versus connective tissue graft in treatment of gingival recessions: Literature review
Aušra Balčiūnaitė, Henrikas Rusilas, Juozas Žilinskas
58-64



© 2020 Stomatologija

Stomatologija 2020; 22 (2): 44-8 198 KB

Stress and associated factors among dentists

Guostė Antanavičienė1, Monika Zaleckytė1, Julija Narbutaitė1, 2

Summary

Objective. Studies have shown that dentists are experiencing stress at work and it might have an impact on general health. Dental students have reported negative effect of stress starting in undergraduate studies period. The various predisposing factors have been identified and determined. The aim of our study was to determine and compare stress among dentists of different specializations.

Materials and methods. A cross-sectional study was conducted in March-September 2016 among 317 dentists. 151 (48%) form public and 166 (52%) from private clinics. All participants were dental practitioners working in Kaunas, Lithuania. A modified version of Occupational stress questionnaire (Institute of Health, Helsinki, Finland, 1992) was used. Chi-square, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test Mann-Whitney U tests, Student’s (t) criterion and logistic regression analysis model served for statistical analysis.

Results. Majority of dentists were women (85%) and 61.8% of all participants were general practitioners. More general practitioners and paediatric dentists specialists were working in public clinics. The most stressful factors were: restrictions, work tension, and responsibility, while least stressful were value of work, work and life satisfaction (p<0.05). The intensive stress (>3) was indicated mostly by general practitioners, pediatric dentists and periodontologists.

Conclusions. Stress is more experienced by dentists working in public clinic being as a general practitioner or having specialization of periodontologist or pediatric dentist. Dentists should be encouraged to take stress management course to cope with.

Key words: dentists, stress, specialization, health, self-assessment.

Received: 24 01 2019

Accepted for publishing: 24 06 2020


1Faculty of Odontology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania

2Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Hospital, Kaunas, Lithuania

Address correspondence to Henrikas Rusilas, Faculty of Odontology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Lukšos-Daumanto 6, LT-50106, Kaunas, Lithuania.

E-mail: guoste.baseviciute@gmail.com